Honua
// trust center

How Honua protects the platform—and your data.

Last updated: July 27, 2026

This page summarizes Honua's security posture for buyers and security reviewers: architecture, encryption, access control, data residency, attestation status, and the public evidence behind each claim. Every statement here describes what exists today; nothing on this page is a certification claim.

Report a vulnerability: security@honua.io · Security Policy · security.txt

Posture at a glance

Honua security posture at a glance
TopicPosition
Deployment modelCustomer-managed self-host by default; you run Honua in your own cloud account.
Workload data accessIn the default self-hosted deployment, Honua has no default access to your workload data. Enabled AI features can send supplied context, report summaries or imagery to the model provider you configure; review the AI data-flow responsibilities.
Control frameworkSecurity program anchored on the CSA Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.
CertificationsNone yet. CSA STAR Level 1 self-assessment in progress; OWASP ASVS Level 1 self-attested. No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certification today.
Vulnerability reportssecurity@honua.io; acknowledgment target within three business days; safe harbor for good-faith research.

Security architecture

Honua Server is a single .NET runtime in which every public protocol surface (GeoServices REST, OGC APIs, WFS/WMS/WMTS, OData, STAC, tiles, gRPC, MCP) is a thin adapter over shared, centrally audited pipelines. Security-relevant behavior is implemented once, not per protocol:

Encryption & data protection

Access control & authentication

Data residency

Because Honua is customer-managed by default, residency is under your control: your data lives in the cloud accounts and regions you choose and does not transit Honua-operated infrastructure. Honua staff have no default access to customer workload data. Any future Honua-managed hosting offering will publish its own residency commitments before launch.

Sub-processors

In the self-hosted default there are no workload sub-processors to disclose: no third party processes your geospatial data on Honua's behalf, because Honua itself does not process it. Two narrower scopes do exist:

Vulnerability disclosure & incident response

Secure development & supply chain

Standards & attestations

Honua's control program is anchored on the CSA Cloud Controls Matrix v4: controls, policies, and evidence are organized against CCM so the same register can later support SOC 2, ISO 27001, and NIST CSF work. The table states current status honestly — self-assessments are not audits, and Honua holds no third-party certification today.

Standards and attestation status
FrameworkStatusHow to obtain
CSA STAR Level 1 (CAIQ v4 self-assessment)In progressThe public STAR registry listing will be linked here once live.
OWASP ASVS v4.0.3 (application security)Level 1 self-attested (June 2026); Level 2 gaps trackedSelf-assessment available on request via security@honua.io.
NIST CSF / CIS Controls v8In progress — first-pass gap assessments draftedOn request once finalized.
SIG Lite questionnaireAnswered, cross-referenced to CCM v4Available on request for active evaluations.
SOC 2 Type IIPlanned — not started; no report exists—

An approved information-security policy set (information security, access control, incident response, change management/SDLC, data classification & retention, business continuity, vendor management, acceptable use) backs the register; policies are shared with evaluating security teams on request.

Request the compliance pack

For a security review, Honua shares a compliance pack drawn from its private control repository. Every artifact in it is a self-attestation or internal working document — none is a third-party certification or audit report, and no SOC 2, ISO 27001, or equivalent certification exists today. Request it at security@honua.io; items marked in progress are shared once finalized.

Compliance pack artifacts and their availability
ArtifactWhat it isAvailability
OWASP ASVS v4.0.3 self-assessmentLevel 1 self-attested (published June 24, 2026), grounded in code review with per-chapter evidence paths; Level 2 gaps tracked as backlog. Self-attested, not audited.On request
SIG Lite questionnaire (answered)Pre-filled SIG Lite answers, first pass June 2026, derived row-by-row from the CCM v4 control register so answers never overstate register status.On request for active evaluations
CSA CCM v4.0 control registerThe master control register (statuses: implemented / partial / planned; last reviewed June 14, 2026) that every other artifact derives from, with a crosswalk toward SOC 2, ISO 27001, and NIST CSF.Walked through with evaluating security teams on request
Information-security policy setEight approved policies (approved June 14, 2026): information security, access control, incident response, change management/SDLC, data classification & retention, business continuity, vendor management, acceptable use.On request under the terms of your evaluation
CAIQ v4.0.3 self-assessment (CSA STAR Level 1)In draft, derived from the CCM register; not yet complete or submitted to the CSA STAR registry. Self-attested when published, not audited.Once submitted; the public STAR listing will be linked here
NIST CSF 2.0 gap self-assessmentProgram-level first-pass gap assessment (June 2026) with a scored function summary and remediation backlog.Once finalized
CIS Controls v8 gap self-assessmentFirst-pass gap assessment against the Implementation Group 1 baseline (June 2026).Once finalized

What we will not claim: none of the above is FedRAMP, StateRAMP, CJIS, SOC 2, ISO 27001, or any other certification, authorization, or third-party attestation. If your review requires a certification Honua does not hold, we will say so directly rather than approximate it.

Public evidence & external validators

Prefer evidence you can check yourself. These surfaces are public and re-runnable:

Public evidence surfaces and external validators
EvidenceWhat it shows
Capability evidence indexPer-capability receipts: proving tests with CI runs, OGC CITE conformance results, real-client interop envelopes, benchmark runs, and executable samples.
GitHub organizationPublic source for the server, SDKs, and tooling — inspect the security middleware, authorization pipeline, and CI gates directly.
OpenSSF ScorecardWeekly supply-chain posture scores for selected public repositories (substitute other honua-io public repositories in the viewer URL; not every repository publishes a Scorecard).
security.txt · Security policyRFC 9116 disclosure channel and the coordinated-disclosure terms behind it.
SSL LabsLive TLS configuration grade for honua.io — run it now.
Mozilla HTTP ObservatoryLive HTTP security-header assessment for honua.io — run it now.
securityheaders.comIndependent response-header check for honua.io — run it now.

Honest boundary: this site is currently served from GitHub Pages, which does not attach the repository's full response-header set, so header-based validator scores reflect the meta-CSP baseline rather than the complete edge-delivered header policy. The security page documents that boundary and when the fuller header set becomes claimable.

Shared responsibility & current scope

Honua secures the software and its release pipeline; you control the cloud account, network perimeter, TLS termination, WAF and rate-limiting policy at the edge, backups, and identity-provider integration unless a signed agreement assigns a responsibility differently. This boundary is deliberate and documented so there are no surprises in a security review — the full split, plus data-processing terms, lives on the Security & DPA page.

Questions from your security team? Email security@honua.io — we will walk through the control register, share the compliance pack artifacts listed above, and provide policy documents under the terms of your evaluation. Commercial and procurement questions: info@honua.io.

AI security assurance

Our AI framework assessment is in progress. Review the framework mappings, source evidence, scope and remaining verification work.